For most families, the breast milk vs. donor milk question arises in one specific context: the NICU. A baby arrives early, the mother's body hasn't had time to establish full supply, and the baby needs human milk now — not in a week when pumping catches up. Donor milk fills that gap.
The clinical evidence for donor milk in premature infants is strongest around necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a devastating intestinal condition that primarily affects very premature babies. A Cochrane review (Quigley et al., 2019) found that formula feeding is associated with a higher risk of NEC compared to donor human milk. For a condition with mortality rates of 20-30%, this difference matters. It's the primary reason over 70% of US NICUs now use donor milk.
But donor milk isn't equivalent to mother's own milk, and understanding the differences helps families make informed decisions and set realistic expectations. Even the earliest milk matters — colostrum, produced in the first days postpartum, provides concentrated immune factors that are especially critical for premature infants. Holder pasteurization — the standard method used by accredited milk banks — heats milk to 62.5 degrees C for 30 minutes. This kills bacteria and viruses, making the milk safe. But it also reduces or destroys some of the most valuable bioactive components: IgA antibodies drop by roughly 70%, lactoferrin by about 60%, and live immune cells are eliminated entirely.